www.theplague.fora.pl

clkelyqld2

's Court Quanshan Anna v. Xuzhou Quanshanqu Population and Family Planning Bureau a first instance verdict, dismissed the plaintiff the defendant sought to withdraw Anna on its "first education after marriage,[url=http://www.kordil.net/packages/]woolrich[/url],[url=http://www.dayuedong.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=226277]http://www.dayuedong.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=226277[/url]," marriage and child rearing claim. The Court has examined: February 19,[url=http://ndesign-studio.com/blog/best-wordpress-sites#comment-1127969]http://ndesign-studio.com/blog/best-wordpress-sites#comment-1127969[/url],[url=http://www.atc.unican.es/cl.php]louboutin pas cher[/url], 2009,[url=http://cgi.www5b.biglobe.ne.jp/~m_s/mmmmmm/yybbs/yybbs.cgi]http://cgi.www5b.biglobe.ne.jp/~m_s/mmmmmm/yybbs/yybbs.cgi[/url],[url=http://www.iprase.tn.it/woolrich.php]woolrich outlet[/url], the plaintiff Wang Yingsheng education a child. In the same year on May 7 with third Lumou Anna received a marriage certificate, and in June 29 to apply for a "one-child parents glorious proof." February 2009, the plaintiff Anna enroll in Jiangsu Province civil service examinations,[url=http://www.age-platform.eu/CRM/plugins/]peuterey[/url],[url=http://bbs.nibaguai.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=980714&fromuid=127416]http://bbs.nibaguai.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=980714&fromuid=127416[/url], apply for jobs as officers Tongshan County People's Procuratorate, and passed the written test, interview, physical examination, meet the political. In the public notice period, Tongshan County People's Procuratorate on July 23, 2009 sent a letter of introduction to the defendant held at Spring Hill Family Planning Bureau on Anna violation of family planning laws and policies have to investigate the situation. Same day, the defendant Quanshan Family Planning Bureau to Copper Mountain People's Procuratorate issued a "marriage and child rearing," says: I Xiyuan office folk community 14-1-301 residents Anna, Lumou February 19, 2009 Non- marriage one child,[url=http://www.ferienhof-kraus.de/typo3/class.php?p=3]hollister[/url], Lu Moumou (male), May 7, 2009 replacement marriage certificate. The couple is illegitimate fertility behavior, violation of the "" Jiangsu Province Population and Family Planning Regulations, "Article 21: Both men and women have not been legally registered marriage and childbearing over, you can have only one child" requirement. Tongshan County Organization Department accordingly at July 31, 2009 made "on the 2009 recruiting civil servants Tongshan meet the political," which says: "Comrade Wang Ying, your violation of family planning policy to meet the political failure, not admission. "October 12,[url=http://www.theirongatetn.com/moncler.php]moncler[/url], 2009, the plaintiff sued the defendant confirmed Quanshan Family Planning Bureau made of the" marriage and child rearing "illegal. February 4 this year,[url=http://www.birtenshaw.org.uk/misc/top.php]hollister sale[/url], the trial,[url=http://www.birtenshaw.org.uk/misc/top.php]hollister outlet[/url], the plaintiff requested the request for a change to: Request for revocation of the defendant on July 23,[url=http://scorephoenix.org/#comment-336168]http://scorephoenix.org/#comment-336168[/url], 2009 to make the "marriage and child rearing." Court debate, the parties focus on the core dispute: the defendant issued by the "marriage and child rearing" behavior is legitimate. The court held that the defendant for its family planning administrative area residents attestation, within its scope of responsibility and authority. Tongshan County People's Procuratorate, the defendant should be required to assist the work, after investigation and verification, to the respondent's "marriage and child rearing" behavior, is the proper discharge of their duties behavior; under the Family Planning Law,[url=http://www.jchs.com/includes/throwback-nfl-jerseys/]nfl jerseys[/url], "Marriage Law" and local laws and regulations in Jiangsu Province legitimate childbearing should be one of the basic conditions for both men and women by a legally registered marriage, or should bear the corresponding legal responsibility. Anna plaintiff and the third person Lumou on February 19,[url=http://www.bishopsboardshop.com/]doudoune moncler[/url], 2009 one child, May 7, 2009 in Xuzhou City Civil Affairs Bureau received a marriage certificate Quanshanqu facts identified by the court and there is no controversy. And the third defendant,[url=http://lamkamtong.com/cgi-bin/honey.bak/honey.cgi]http://lamkamtong.com/cgi-bin/honey.bak/honey.cgi[/url], the plaintiff's reproductive behavior is illegitimate fertility requirements, the evidence is conclusive, the applicable law is correct. Judgment also believes that "Supreme Court on the application of number of issues of interpretation" (a) the provisions of Article IV,[url=http://www.bishopsboardshop.com/]doudoune moncler pas cher[/url], "both men and women according to the Marriage Law Article VIII of marriage registration, the effectiveness of the marital relationship from both sides Marriage meet the required elements of the essence of marriage begins when. "does not exclude the couple's fertility behavior management of family planning should be consistent with the legal requirements, the plaintiff based on" Marriage Law "provisions of Article VIII and the" Supreme People's Court on the application of number of issues of interpretation "(a) the provisions of Article IV, that its Now that marriage registration,[url=http://www.theirongatetn.com/woolrich_outlet.php]woolrich[/url], marriage and therefore the effectiveness of traceability and cohabitation during their reproductive behavior is advocated marital fertility, is the law misunderstanding, the court not support it. Although the plaintiff made a "one-child parents glorious card", only to prove that the plaintiff child parents meet to enjoy the treatment of conditions,[url=http://www5e.biglobe.ne.jp/~faru/yybbs/yybbs.cgi]http://www5e.biglobe.ne.jp/~faru/yybbs/yybbs.cgi[/url], and can not serve as the plaintiff premarital childbearing behavior legitimacy of evidence. Issued pursuant to the plaintiff sued the defendant advocates of the "marriage and child rearing" act is back on its word,[url=http://www.61maimai.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=497854]http://www.61maimai.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=497854[/url], abuse of power, contrary to the objective facts.